Nitin Mahadev Pawaskar vs Raghunath Yashwant Walawalkar — 82/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 120,405,406,463,464,465,468,471,34. Status: Stayed by District Court. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI040005452023
e-Filing Number
05-08-2023
Filing Number
439/2023
Filing Date
07-Aug-2023
Registration No
82/2023
Registration Date
07-Aug-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kudal
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nitin Mahadev Pawaskar
Adv. DHURI TUKARAM
-
2.Dattaguru Mohan Shirsat
Adv. DHURI TUKARAM ARJUN
-
3.Mahesh Vasudev Shirsat
Adv. DHURI TUKARAM ARJUN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raghunath Yashwant Walawalkar
Case History
-
12-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
24-Mar-2026
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
08-Jan-2026
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
12-Nov-2025
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
22-Sep-2025
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
19-Jul-2025
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
02-Jun-2025
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
28-Apr-2025
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
10-Mar-2025
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
04-Jan-2025
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
22-Nov-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
05-Oct-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
09-Aug-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
02-Jul-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
05-Jun-2024
Stayed by District Court
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
25-Apr-2024
Stayed by District Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
27-Mar-2024
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
30-Jan-2024
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
07-Dec-2023
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
30-Oct-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 82/2023 The petition was rejected. Petitioners alleged that flat owners in Sateri Complex conspired to create false documents and forged signatures to fraudulently register a society with the Deputy Registrar. The court found that mandatory procedural requirements under Section 154(3) CrPC were not satisfied, as petitioners failed to escalate the complaint to the Superintendent of Police after police refused to register the case. Additionally, on merits, the court determined that registration of offence would constitute abuse of process given the documentary nature of evidence and the incident's age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Oct-2023
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
04-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
08-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal
-
07-Aug-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
07-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 82/2023
Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 82/2023 The petition was rejected. Petitioners alleged that flat owners in Sateri Complex conspired to create false documents and forged signatures to fraudulently register a society with the Deputy Registrar. The court found that mandatory procedural requirements under Section 154(3) CrPC were not satisfied, as petitioners failed to escalate the complaint to the Superintendent of Police after police refused to register the case. Additionally, on merits, the court determined that registration of offence would constitute abuse of process given the documentary nature of evidence and the incident's age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts