Jaysing Anant Kavathkar vs Vandana Vithhal Kavathkar Advocate - MARGI LAXMAN PANDURANG — 82/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section u/s38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 02-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI040004232022

Filing Number

114/2022

Filing Date

14-Jun-2022

Registration No

82/2022

Registration Date

14-Jun-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kudal

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section u/s38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jaysing Anant Kavathkar

    Adv. MALGAONKAR SURENDRA GHARU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vandana Vithhal Kavathkar Advocate - MARGI LAXMAN PANDURANG

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  9. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  10. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  11. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  12. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  13. 31-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  14. 06-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  15. 02-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  16. 19-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  17. 20-Sep-2024

    Argument on Pre_Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  18. 02-Aug-2024

    Argument on Pre_Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  19. 14-Jun-2024

    Argument on Pre_Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  20. 11-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  21. 23-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  22. 05-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  23. 09-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  24. 14-Aug-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  25. 28-Jun-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  26. 06-May-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  27. 24-Apr-2023

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: 82/2022 Case: Civil Suit No. 82/2022 - Jaysing Anant Kavathkar v. Vandana Vithhal Kavathkar Order: The petition/application was allowed. The court directed that the suit be decided on merits, dismissing preliminary objections raised by the respondent. The court ordered that the defendant-respondent's arguments regarding jurisdiction and maintainability be rejected, allowing the plaintiff-petitioner's suit to proceed to final hearing. Key Outcome: The suit was permitted to continue with directions for further proceedings as per the Civil Procedure Code, with the respondent directed to file appropriate written statements and respond to the plaintiff's claims on the substantive issues of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  28. 24-Apr-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  29. 21-Mar-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  30. 21-Feb-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  31. 10-Jan-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  32. 14-Nov-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  33. 03-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  34. 12-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  35. 22-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  36. 08-Aug-2022

    Order on Exhibit

  37. 08-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  38. 25-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  39. 18-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  40. 11-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  41. 05-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  42. 28-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  43. 24-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  44. 21-Jun-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  45. 16-Jun-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  46. 14-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 14-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 82/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 82/2022 Case: Civil Suit No. 82/2022 - Jaysing Anant Kavathkar v. Vandana Vithhal Kavathkar Order: The petition/application was allowed. The court directed that the suit be decided on merits, dismissing preliminary objections raised by the respondent. The court ordered that the defendant-respondent's arguments regarding jurisdiction and maintainability be rejected, allowing the plaintiff-petitioner's suit to proceed to final hearing. Key Outcome: The suit was permitted to continue with directions for further proceedings as per the Civil Procedure Code, with the respondent directed to file appropriate written statements and respond to the plaintiff's claims on the substantive issues of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case