Ramchandra Ramkrishna Rane etc.8 vs Bharat Baburao Parabetc.15 Advocate - SAWANT SUHAS SHANTARAM — 62/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section u/s38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 15-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI040002962022

Filing Number

83/2022

Filing Date

11-Apr-2022

Registration No

62/2022

Registration Date

11-Apr-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kudal

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section u/s38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramchandra Ramkrishna Rane etc.8

    Adv. MANDKULKAR VIVEK BHALCHANDRA

  2. 2.Anaji Ramkrishna Rane

  3. 3.Harichhandra Madhukar Rane

  4. 4.Sitaram Rajaram Rane

  5. 5.Prabhakar Gunaji Rane

  6. 6.Manohar Vijay Rane

  7. 7.Anil Liladhar Rane

  8. 8.Vasudeo Sitaram Rane

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Baburao Parabetc.15 Advocate - SAWANT SUHAS SHANTARAM

  2. 2.Ramdas Bhagvan Parab

  3. 3.Satyavan Pandurang Parab

  4. 4.Nilesh Bharat Parab

  5. 5.Milind Bharat Parab

  6. 6.Mahesh Dasharath Parab

  7. 7.Suryakant Dhondi Parab

  8. 8.Eknath Dhondi Parab

  9. 9.Dinesh Dasharath Parab

  10. 10.Gajanan Sahadeo Parab

  11. 11.Prakash Mohan Parab

  12. 12.Dulaji Shankar Parab

  13. 13.Ramesh Vasudeo Parab

  14. 14.Satish Vasant Parab

  15. 15.Rajesh Vasant Parab

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  6. 14-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  7. 19-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  8. 15-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  9. 10-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  11. 23-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  12. 23-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  13. 09-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  14. 26-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  15. 12-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  16. 08-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  17. 09-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  18. 11-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  19. 22-Oct-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 22-Oct-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 62/2022 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that petitioner Ramchandra Ramkrishna Rane lacked the necessary standing (locus standi) and was not a proper/necessary party to the suit. The dispute concerns property rights and religious rituals related to a village temple, with the court determining that the petitioner failed to establish any direct legal relationship or interest in the matter, and no genealogical connection to respondents Defendants No. 9 and 10 was proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 22-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  22. 24-Sep-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  23. 07-Aug-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  24. 06-Jul-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  25. 19-Jun-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  26. 29-Apr-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  27. 23-Apr-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  28. 20-Mar-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  29. 02-Mar-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  30. 07-Feb-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  31. 10-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  32. 06-Dec-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  33. 08-Nov-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  34. 11-Oct-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  35. 11-Oct-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  36. 11-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  37. 13-Sep-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  38. 13-Sep-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  39. 23-Aug-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  40. 26-Jul-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  41. 05-Jul-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  42. 07-Jun-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  43. 12-Apr-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  44. 15-Mar-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  45. 15-Feb-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  46. 20-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  47. 04-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  48. 06-Dec-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  49. 15-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  50. 13-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  51. 10-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  52. 04-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  53. 27-Apr-2022

    First Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  54. 11-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 11-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 62/2022 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that petitioner Ramchandra Ramkrishna Rane lacked the necessary standing (locus standi) and was not a proper/necessary party to the suit. The dispute concerns property rights and religious rituals related to a village temple, with the court determining that the petitioner failed to establish any direct legal relationship or interest in the matter, and no genealogical connection to respondents Defendants No. 9 and 10 was proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case