The State Of Maharashtra through Pravin Babruvahan Ohol, Fertilizer Inspector vs Rajesh Abhimanyu Swami etc 2 Advocate - RAORANE RAJENDRA VISHRAM — 34/2016
Case under Essential Commodities (Special Provisions) Act Section 3,7(1)(a)(ii). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI030001282016
Filing Number
128/2016
Filing Date
26-Oct-2016
Registration No
34/2016
Registration Date
26-Oct-2016
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Sindhudurg
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Sindhudurgnagari
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Of Maharashtra through Pravin Babruvahan Ohol, Fertilizer Inspector
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajesh Abhimanyu Swami etc 2 Advocate - RAORANE RAJENDRA VISHRAM
-
2.Prakash Lakshman Ghadigavkar
Adv. SAWANT UMESH SURESH
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
08-May-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
05-Dec-2025
Report
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
11-Nov-2025
Report
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
07-Oct-2025
Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
19-Sep-2025
Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
22-Aug-2025
Hearing Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
18-Jul-2025
Hearing Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
24-Jun-2025
Hearing Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
16-May-2025
Hearing Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
11-Mar-2025
EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary: 34/2016 In this criminal case, the accused (a fertilizer inspector) filed a sworn statement during cross-examination regarding fertilizer samples collected on 13/06/2012. The court admitted documentary evidence (J-forms and K-forms) with the accused's signatures and confirmed the details were accurate. Laboratory analysis declared the fertilizer sub-standard. The case is adjourned pending further proceedings, with cross-examination of the accused to resume after charges are formally framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
25-Oct-2024
EvidenceView PDF
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
16-Aug-2024
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
12-Jul-2024
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
12-Apr-2024
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
17-Feb-2024
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
06-Jan-2024
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
19-Dec-2023
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
27-Oct-2023
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
13-Sep-2023
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
21-Jul-2023
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
22-Jun-2023
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
17-May-2023
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
27-Mar-2023
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
10-Feb-2023
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
30-Dec-2022
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
19-Nov-2022
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
16-Sep-2022
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
01-Aug-2022
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
24-Jun-2022
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
08-Apr-2022
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
04-Mar-2022
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
07-Jan-2022
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
26-Nov-2021
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
24-Sep-2021
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
10-Aug-2021
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
06-Jul-2021
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
25-May-2021
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
31-Mar-2021
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
28-Jan-2021
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
26-Nov-2020
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
09-Oct-2020
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
07-Aug-2020
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
19-Jun-2020
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
07-Apr-2020
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
07-Feb-2020
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
22-Nov-2019
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
11-Oct-2019
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
17-Sep-2019
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
27-Aug-2019
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
30-Jul-2019
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
25-Jun-2019
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
17-May-2019
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
07-May-2019
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
16-Apr-2019
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
12-Mar-2019
Evidence Before Charge
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
12-Feb-2019
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
18-Dec-2018
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
26-Oct-2018
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
28-Sep-2018
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
24-Aug-2018
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
10-Jul-2018
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
12-Jun-2018
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
24-Apr-2018
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
23-Mar-2018
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
23-Feb-2018
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
16-Jan-2018
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
24-Nov-2017
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
24-Oct-2017
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
26-Sep-2017
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
11-Aug-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
18-Jul-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
02-May-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
11-Apr-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
24-Mar-2017
Unready Board
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
03-Feb-2017
Unready Board
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
16-Dec-2016
Unready Board
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
22-Nov-2016
Unready Board
Chief Judicial Magistrate Sindhudurg
-
26-Oct-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Oct-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2016
Case Summary: 34/2016 In this criminal case, the accused (a fertilizer inspector) filed a sworn statement during cross-examination regarding fertilizer samples collected on 13/06/2012. The court admitted documentary evidence (J-forms and K-forms) with the accused's signatures and confirmed the details were accurate. Laboratory analysis declared the fertilizer sub-standard. The case is adjourned pending further proceedings, with cross-examination of the accused to resume after charges are formally framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts