Prakash Sitaram Rasal vs Department Controlar, State Transport Office , Sindhudurg etc.2 Advocate - SAVITA RAMAKANT MASURKAR/KUDTADKAR — 1/2024
Case under Maharashtra Government Premises (Eviction) Act Section 7-1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Civil Appeal PPE - Civil Appeal under Public Premises Act
CNR: MHSI010008492024
e-Filing Number
11-10-2024
Filing Number
584/2024
Filing Date
11-Oct-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
11-Oct-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Sindhudurg
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prakash Sitaram Rasal
Adv. KHANOLKAR YATISH RATNAKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Department Controlar, State Transport Office , Sindhudurg etc.2 Advocate - SAVITA RAMAKANT MASURKAR/KUDTADKAR
-
2.The Resident Deputy Collector Sindhudurg
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
03-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
29-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
04-Oct-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
02-Aug-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
19-Jul-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
21-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
03-May-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
01-Apr-2025
Awaiting R and P
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
21-Mar-2025
Awaiting R and P
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
18-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
18-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The Principal District Judge granted a stay on execution of the lower authority's order dated 29.08.2024 that directed the appellant to pay Rs. 8,96,759/- in rent, license, and service charges under the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955. The stay is conditional on the appellant depositing Rs. 1,00,000 within 15 days. The court found the original order lacked reasoning and proper application of mind, being non-compliant with the requirement for a "Speaking Order" in quasi-judicial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2025
Awaiting R and P
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
15-Mar-2025
Order on Exh
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
05-Feb-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
05-Feb-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
05-Feb-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
05-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
15-Jan-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
15-Jan-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
04-Dec-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Dec-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
08-Nov-2024
Awaiting Notice
Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg
-
11-Oct-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
11-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2024
Summary The Principal District Judge granted a stay on execution of the lower authority's order dated 29.08.2024 that directed the appellant to pay Rs. 8,96,759/- in rent, license, and service charges under the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955. The stay is conditional on the appellant depositing Rs. 1,00,000 within 15 days. The court found the original order lacked reasoning and proper application of mind, being non-compliant with the requirement for a "Speaking Order" in quasi-judicial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts