Shubhangi Atmaram Jadhav vs Santosh Jagannath Jadhav Advocate - RANSHUR BALAJI BABURAO — 14/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application

CNR: MHSI010003012022

Filing Number

143/2022

Filing Date

18-Apr-2022

Registration No

14/2022

Registration Date

18-Apr-2022

Court

District and Session Court , Sindhudurg

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shubhangi Atmaram Jadhav

    Adv. SAWANT AMIT RAMAKANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Jagannath Jadhav Advocate - RANSHUR BALAJI BABURAO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA 14/2022 The Sessions Court allowed the complainant's revision application, finding that the trial court erred in permitting a third cross-examination of the complainant after she had already been cross-examined twice and the trial had reached the accused's statement recording stage (Section 313 CrPC). The court held that the accused's delay tactic—taking 41 adjournments before requesting fresh cross-examination—constituted harassment and violated criminal procedure principles requiring all cross-examination questions be completed in one continuous sequence. The court emphasized that repeated cross-examinations with intermittent gaps would undermine judicial efficiency and allow abuse of process, finding the trial court's reliance on Section 311 CrPC was misapplied given the peculiar circumstances causing prejudice to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  4. 07-May-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  5. 05-May-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  7. 27-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  8. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  9. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  10. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  13. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  14. 28-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  15. 09-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  16. 08-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg

  17. 22-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  18. 15-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  19. 25-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg

  20. 11-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg

  21. 28-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg

  22. 17-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg

  23. 12-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg

  24. 20-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg

  25. 28-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg

  26. 17-May-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  27. 19-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  28. 15-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  29. 02-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  30. 22-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  31. 21-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  32. 17-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  33. 05-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  34. 08-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  35. 04-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  36. 23-May-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  37. 11-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  38. 07-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  39. 09-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  40. 28-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  41. 18-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  42. 16-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  43. 11-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  44. 29-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  45. 27-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  46. 19-May-2022

    Unready Board

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  47. 18-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 18-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA 14/2022 The Sessions Court allowed the complainant's revision application, finding that the trial court erred in permitting a third cross-examination of the complainant after she had already been cross-examined twice and the trial had reached the accused's statement recording stage (Section 313 CrPC). The court held that the accused's delay tactic—taking 41 adjournments before requesting fresh cross-examination—constituted harassment and violated criminal procedure principles requiring all cross-examination questions be completed in one continuous sequence. The court emphasized that repeated cross-examinations with intermittent gaps would undermine judicial efficiency and allow abuse of process, finding the trial court's reliance on Section 311 CrPC was misapplied given the peculiar circumstances causing prejudice to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case