Anil Purushottam Barve vs Zilha Parishad Sindhudurg Through Chief Executive Officer Advocate - TAYSHETE SANDESH KRISHNA — 7/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 43 Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHSI010002402024

e-Filing Number

16-03-2024

Filing Number

169/2024

Filing Date

19-Mar-2024

Registration No

7/2024

Registration Date

19-Mar-2024

Court

District and Session Court , Sindhudurg

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 43 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Purushottam Barve

    Adv. BARVE ANIL PARUSHOTTAM

  2. 2.Arun Purushottam Barve Through Power Of Attorney Sr No 1 Anil Purushottam Barve

    Adv. BARVE ANIL PURUSHOTTAM

  3. 3.Sanjay Govind Barve Through Power Of Attorney Sr No 1 Anil Purushottam Barve

    Adv. BARVE ANIL PURUSHOTTAM

  4. 4.Geeta Sadanand Barve Through Power Of Attorney Sr No 1 Anil Purushottam Barve

    Adv. BARVE ANIL PURUSHOTTAM

  5. 5.Nirmal Sadanand Barve Through Power Of Attorney Sr No 1 Anil Purushottam Barve

    Adv. BARVE ANIL PURUSHOTTAM

  6. 6.Dinakar Ganpat Barve Through Power Of Attorney Sr No 1 Anil Purushottam Barve

    Adv. BARVE ANIL PURUSHOTTAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Zilha Parishad Sindhudurg Through Chief Executive Officer Advocate - TAYSHETE SANDESH KRISHNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    In MCA No. 07/2024, the Principal District Judge of Sindhudurg disposed of the appeal filed by Anil Purushottam Barve and others against Zilha Parishad Sindhudurg as withdrawn. The appellant filed an unconditional withdrawal petition, and the respondent's advocate offered no objection, leading the court to accept the withdrawal without imposing any costs on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  8. 26-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  9. 12-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  10. 10-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  11. 15-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  12. 06-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  13. 07-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  14. 08-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  15. 20-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  16. 16-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  17. 26-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge Sindhudurg

  18. 19-Mar-2024

    Order on Exhibit

  19. 19-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 19-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In MCA No. 07/2024, the Principal District Judge of Sindhudurg disposed of the appeal filed by Anil Purushottam Barve and others against Zilha Parishad Sindhudurg as withdrawn. The appellant filed an unconditional withdrawal petition, and the respondent's advocate offered no objection, leading the court to accept the withdrawal without imposing any costs on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case