Prashant Vinayak Dhekane vs Namdev Eknath Patole Advocate - Chavan Nilesh Kesari — 158/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT090003352017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
282/2017
Filing Date
19-09-2017
Registration No
158/2017
Registration Date
19-09-2017
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Lanja
Judge
1-Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C LANJA
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prashant Vinayak Dhekane
Adv. Jain Manohar Manikchand
Respondent(s)
Namdev Eknath Patole Advocate - Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C LANJA
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 05-03-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the cheque bounce complaint (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Prashant Vinayak Dhekane against Namdev Eknath Patole for want of prosecution under Section 256 CrPC, as the complainant remained absent and took no steps despite sufficient time. The accused was acquitted and his bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the cheque bounce complaint (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Prashant Vinayak Dhekane against Namdev Eknath Patole for want of prosecution under Section 256 CrPC, as the complainant remained absent and took no steps despite sufficient time. The accused was acquitted and his bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts