Najir Abdul Rahiman Waghu etc.2 vs Hamid Dhondu Waghu,etc.14 Advocate - Chavan Nilesh Kesari — 900047/2012
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRT090003112012
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
900046/2012
Filing Date
09-11-2012
Registration No
900047/2012
Registration Date
09-11-2012
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Lanja
Judge
1-Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C LANJA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Najir Abdul Rahiman Waghu etc.2
Adv. Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra
Maimunna Noorhusain Mulla
Adv. Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra
Respondent(s)
Hamid Dhondu Waghu,etc.14 Advocate - Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Husain Dhondu Waghu
Adv. Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Rahim Dhondu Waghu(Legal Heir)
Adv. Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Jamilabi Usman Mapari
Adv. Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Fatimabi Ahmad Malim
Adv. Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Abdul Dhondu Waghu
Adv. Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Niyajahmad Dhondu Waghu
Adv. Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Ismail Abdul Rahiman Waghu(Legal Heir)
Adv. In Person
Gani Abdul Rahiman Waghu
Adv. Ex-parte
Mubarak Abdul Rahiman Waghu
Adv. In Person
Chandmiya Abdul Rahiman Waghu
Adv. In Person
Mariyabi Kasam Waghu(Legal Heir)
Adv. In Person
Rajaram Devji Gurav
Adv. Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Gunaji Govind Gurav
Adv. Ex-parte
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C LANJA
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-03-2026 | Steps_Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Steps_Unready | |
| 12-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application to remove defendant No. 8A from the suit record was allowed. The court deleted the name of defendant No. 8A from the proceedings, as the defendant had deceased and the heirs were already on record. The suit will proceed as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application to remove defendant No. 8A from the suit record was allowed. The court deleted the name of defendant No. 8A from the proceedings, as the defendant had deceased and the heirs were already on record. The suit will proceed as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts