Harishchandra Gurudas Tambe vs Suresh Punaji Tambe Advocate - Chavan Nilesh Kesari — 12/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRT090001182025
e-Filing Number
21-03-2025
Filing Number
21/2025
Filing Date
24-Mar-2025
Registration No
12/2025
Registration Date
24-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Lanja
Judge
1-Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Harishchandra Gurudas Tambe
Adv. Jedhe Leena Ganpat
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suresh Punaji Tambe Advocate - Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary Case: Harishchandra Gurudas Tambe v. Suresh Punaji Tambe (R.C.S. No. 12/2025) Outcome: The Court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Critically, the court held that because the plaintiff's father's previous suit (R.C.S. No. 45/2012) for perpetual injunction on the same properties was dismissed for default in 2018, the plaintiff is barred from filing a fresh suit on the same cause of action under Order IX, Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The only remedy available was to seek restoration of the dismissed suit, which the plaintiff did not pursue successfully. Both parties shall bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Issues
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
13-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
04-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
10-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
06-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
05-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
02-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
24-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
23-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
17-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
05-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
22-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
19-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
15-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
03-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
18-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
11-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
29-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
17-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
16-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
29-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
11-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
19-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
21-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
07-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
24-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
05-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
29-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
28-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
24-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
17-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
08-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
03-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
24-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2025
Case Summary Case: Harishchandra Gurudas Tambe v. Suresh Punaji Tambe (R.C.S. No. 12/2025) Outcome: The Court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Critically, the court held that because the plaintiff's father's previous suit (R.C.S. No. 45/2012) for perpetual injunction on the same properties was dismissed for default in 2018, the plaintiff is barred from filing a fresh suit on the same cause of action under Order IX, Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The only remedy available was to seek restoration of the dismissed suit, which the plaintiff did not pursue successfully. Both parties shall bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts