State of Maharashtra vs Tukaram Lakshman Aagre Advocate - Chavan Nilesh Kesari — 48/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT090001122020
Filing Number
93/2020
Filing Date
15-Apr-2020
Registration No
48/2020
Registration Date
15-Apr-2020
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Lanja
Judge
1-Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
99
Police Station
Lanja Police Station.
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tukaram Lakshman Aagre Advocate - Chavan Nilesh Kesari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The First Class Magistrate Court of Lanja acquitted 87-year-old Tukaram Lakshman Agre of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, for alleged illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt—crucially, the investigation report was not produced, the seizure panchnama lacked corroborating witnesses, and only one panchnama witness testified, whose credibility was undermined during cross-examination regarding procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
16-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
10-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
04-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
21-Jul-2025
Hearing
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
17-Jul-2025
Compliance
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
13-Jun-2025
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
25-Apr-2025
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
27-Mar-2025
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
17-Feb-2025
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
10-Jan-2025
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
23-Dec-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
07-Oct-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
20-Aug-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
22-Jul-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
15-Apr-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
20-Feb-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
28-Aug-2023
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
16-Jun-2023
Plea / Particulars
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
13-Apr-2023
Appearance
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
14-Feb-2023
Appearance
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
19-Nov-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
28-Jul-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
23-May-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
11-Jan-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
21-Oct-2021
Awaiting Summons
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
08-Jul-2021
Awaiting Summons
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
15-Mar-2021
Awaiting Summons
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
17-Dec-2020
Awaiting Summons
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
05-Oct-2020
Awaiting Summons
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
08-Jul-2020
Awaiting Summons
Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C Lanja
-
15-Apr-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2020
Summary The First Class Magistrate Court of Lanja acquitted 87-year-old Tukaram Lakshman Agre of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, for alleged illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt—crucially, the investigation report was not produced, the seizure panchnama lacked corroborating witnesses, and only one panchnama witness testified, whose credibility was undermined during cross-examination regarding procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts