Vaijayanti Krishna Shelar etc. 3 vs Madhav Shankar Kolvankar etc. 5 Advocate - Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra — 1/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition

CNR: MHRT090000532018

Steps_Unready

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

13/2018

Filing Date

03-03-2018

Registration No

1/2018

Registration Date

03-03-2018

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Lanja

Judge

1-Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C LANJA

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 21

Petitioner(s)

Vaijayanti Krishna Shelar etc. 3

Adv. Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra

Deepak Krishna Shelar

Adv. Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra

Shivram Krishna Shelar (Deleted)

Adv. Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra

Respondent(s)

Madhav Shankar Kolvankar etc. 5 Advocate - Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra

Ganesh Shankar Kolvankar

Adv. Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra

Sushila Shankar Kolvankar (Deleted)

Adv. Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra

Sneha Santosh Bhingarde

Shradhha Shrikant Korgaonkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C LANJA

21-04-2026

Steps_Unready

24-03-2026

Steps_Unready

10-03-2026

Steps

12-02-2026

Steps

15-01-2026

Steps

Interim Orders

08-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The petition in Application No. 01/2018 was allowed. The court directed the applicant to make the requested correction in the sale deed document and file the corrected deed within the specified timeframe. No objections were raised by the opposing party regarding the proposed amendment, and the court found no adverse impact on the document from making this correction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition in Application No. 01/2018 was allowed. The court directed the applicant to make the requested correction in the sale deed document and file the corrected deed within the specified timeframe. No objections were raised by the opposing party regarding the proposed amendment, and the court found no adverse impact on the document from making this correction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Lanja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case