State of Maharashtra Through Deorukh Police Station vs Yogesh Gajanan Mhade Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram — 368/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT080007982022
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
640/2022
Filing Date
23-11-2022
Registration No
368/2022
Registration Date
23-11-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
FIR Details
FIR Number
150
Police Station
Deorukh Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Deorukh Police Station
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Yogesh Gajanan Mhade Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 11-11-2025 | Hearing | |
| 28-10-2025 | Hearing | |
| 11-08-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness examination record (not a final judgment) in criminal case FIR 368/2022 from Deorukh court, Ratnagiri district. Witness Vaman Vithal Panagale testified on behalf of the prosecution in an alleged liquor seizure case, but his testimony contained inconsistencies—he initially signed documents without reading them and later contradicted his own statements regarding police procedures and evidence collection. The court admitted the post-hearing statement and noted the witness's credibility issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness examination record (not a final judgment) in criminal case FIR 368/2022 from Deorukh court, Ratnagiri district. Witness Vaman Vithal Panagale testified on behalf of the prosecution in an alleged liquor seizure case, but his testimony contained inconsistencies—he initially signed documents without reading them and later contradicted his own statements regarding police procedures and evidence collection. The court admitted the post-hearing statement and noted the witness's credibility issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts