State of Maharashtra Through Deorukh Police Station vs Pratamesh Ramesh Sogam etc 3 Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram — 85/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 26-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRT080006712023

Filing Number

557/2023

Filing Date

02-Nov-2023

Registration No

85/2023

Registration Date

02-Nov-2023

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

132

Police Station

Deorukh Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Deorukh Police Station

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pratamesh Ramesh Sogam etc 3 Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram

  2. 2.Neha @ Rashmi Satywan Pawar

    Adv. Suhel Salim Shaikh

  3. 3.Majibulla Ashruf Khan

    Adv. Murudkar Bhakti Sagar

Case History

  1. 26-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  4. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  5. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  6. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  7. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  8. 07-Jul-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  9. 07-Jul-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary Case: N.Fo.K. No. 85/2023 (Deorukh Court, Maharashtra) Outcome: The cross-examination of accused #1 and #2 was completed and bail/acquittal for accused #1 and #2 is upheld (उलटतपास पूर्ण). For accused #3, the defense counsel B.S. Murudkar adopted the same cross-examination arguments as for accused #1 and #2, with the objection being overruled. The case proceeded with examination of witnesses in a theft case involving temple bell theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  11. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  12. 15-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  13. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  14. 21-Jan-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  15. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  16. 17-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  17. 12-Nov-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  18. 04-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  19. 16-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  20. 08-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  21. 04-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  22. 01-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  23. 18-Apr-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  24. 18-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  25. 29-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  26. 23-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  27. 21-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  28. 16-Feb-2024

    ChargeView PDF

  29. 16-Feb-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  30. 09-Jan-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  31. 02-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 02-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: N.Fo.K. No. 85/2023 (Deorukh Court, Maharashtra) Outcome: The cross-examination of accused #1 and #2 was completed and bail/acquittal for accused #1 and #2 is upheld (उलटतपास पूर्ण). For accused #3, the defense counsel B.S. Murudkar adopted the same cross-examination arguments as for accused #1 and #2, with the objection being overruled. The case proceeded with examination of witnesses in a theft case involving temple bell theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case