State of Maharashtra Through Sangmeshwar Police Station vs Manoj Alias Nana Pandurang Jagushte — 187/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT080004352025
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
334/2025
Filing Date
07-10-2025
Registration No
187/2025
Registration Date
07-10-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
Sangmeshwar Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Sangmeshwar Police Station
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Manoj Alias Nana Pandurang Jagushte
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
List of Witness
Filing of Vakilpatra
Filing of Vakilpatra
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | List of Witness | |
| 10-02-2026 | Filing of Vakilpatra | |
| 03-12-2025 | Filing of Vakilpatra | |
| 01-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 07-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Summons Criminal Case No. 187/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate F.C. Deorukh, the accused Manoj alias Nana Pandurang Jagushte was charged under section 65(e) of The Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for unlawful possession of alcoholic beverages without proper permit/license on 26/08/2024. During the plea proceedings on 10/03/2026, the accused pleaded not guilty and declined state-funded legal aid, and the case was recorded for trial to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Summons Criminal Case No. 187/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate F.C. Deorukh, the accused Manoj alias Nana Pandurang Jagushte was charged under section 65(e) of The Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for unlawful possession of alcoholic beverages without proper permit/license on 26/08/2024. During the plea proceedings on 10/03/2026, the accused pleaded not guilty and declined state-funded legal aid, and the case was recorded for trial to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts