State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Ratnagiri vs Siddharth Yashwant Gamare Advocate - Chavan Punam Chandrashekhar — 159/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRT080003872025

Filing Number

295/2025

Filing Date

12-Aug-2025

Registration No

159/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

181

Police Station

Excise Office, Ratnagiri

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Ratnagiri

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Siddharth Yashwant Gamare Advocate - Chavan Punam Chandrashekhar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and stopped criminal proceedings for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that despite repeated summons, the prosecution failed to secure witness presence and did not file the chemical analysis report, making it futile to continue the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  5. 18-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  6. 07-Oct-2025

    PleaView PDF

  7. 07-Oct-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  8. 12-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and stopped criminal proceedings for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that despite repeated summons, the prosecution failed to secure witness presence and did not file the chemical analysis report, making it futile to continue the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case