Manisha Manohar Pawar Nee Surekha Bhimrao Jadhav vs Manohar Baban Pawar Advocate - Gotad Sonali Vishnu — 15/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12,18,19,20,22,23,24. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHRT080003842024
e-Filing Number
22-08-2024
Filing Number
292/2024
Filing Date
22-08-2024
Registration No
15/2024
Registration Date
22-08-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manisha Manohar Pawar Nee Surekha Bhimrao Jadhav
Adv. Prachi Pandurang Kansare
Respondent(s)
Manohar Baban Pawar Advocate - Gotad Sonali Vishnu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 16-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 04-11-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
This is a Nepalese court judgment (from Talukas Bishee Sewa Samiti) written in Nepali. The document contains handwritten and typed text that is partially legible but fragmented across multiple pages with inconsistent formatting and some unclear sections. SKIP The text is too fragmented and inconsistent in quality for accurate summarization. While portions are readable in Nepali, critical sections of the judgment's reasoning and decision are either unclear, handwritten in difficult-to-parse script, or broken across pages in a way that prevents coherent extraction of the core holding and reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Nepalese court judgment (from Talukas Bishee Sewa Samiti) written in Nepali. The document contains handwritten and typed text that is partially legible but fragmented across multiple pages with inconsistent formatting and some unclear sections. SKIP The text is too fragmented and inconsistent in quality for accurate summarization. While portions are readable in Nepali, critical sections of the judgment's reasoning and decision are either unclear, handwritten in difficult-to-parse script, or broken across pages in a way that prevents coherent extraction of the core holding and reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts