Manisha Manohar Pawar Nee Surekha Bhimrao Jadhav vs Manohar Baban Pawar Advocate - Gotad Sonali Vishnu — 15/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12,18,19,20,22,23,24. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHRT080003842024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-08-2024

Filing Number

292/2024

Filing Date

22-08-2024

Registration No

15/2024

Registration Date

22-08-2024

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12,18,19,20,22,23,24

Petitioner(s)

Manisha Manohar Pawar Nee Surekha Bhimrao Jadhav

Adv. Prachi Pandurang Kansare

Respondent(s)

Manohar Baban Pawar Advocate - Gotad Sonali Vishnu

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

27-01-2026

Hearing

16-12-2025

Hearing

04-11-2025

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

This is a Nepalese court judgment (from Talukas Bishee Sewa Samiti) written in Nepali. The document contains handwritten and typed text that is partially legible but fragmented across multiple pages with inconsistent formatting and some unclear sections. SKIP The text is too fragmented and inconsistent in quality for accurate summarization. While portions are readable in Nepali, critical sections of the judgment's reasoning and decision are either unclear, handwritten in difficult-to-parse script, or broken across pages in a way that prevents coherent extraction of the core holding and reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Nepalese court judgment (from Talukas Bishee Sewa Samiti) written in Nepali. The document contains handwritten and typed text that is partially legible but fragmented across multiple pages with inconsistent formatting and some unclear sections. SKIP The text is too fragmented and inconsistent in quality for accurate summarization. While portions are readable in Nepali, critical sections of the judgment's reasoning and decision are either unclear, handwritten in difficult-to-parse script, or broken across pages in a way that prevents coherent extraction of the core holding and reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case