State of Maharashtra Through Deorukh Police Station vs Nandkumar Sitaram Dalvi Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram — 188/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT080003672024
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
279/2024
Filing Date
12-08-2024
Registration No
188/2024
Registration Date
12-08-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
FIR Details
FIR Number
65
Police Station
Deorukh Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Deorukh Police Station
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Nandkumar Sitaram Dalvi Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 22-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 30-09-2025 | Hearing | |
| 05-08-2025 | Hearing | |
| 28-04-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
This is a criminal court document from Deorukh (Ratnagiri, Maharashtra) dated 10.03.2026, recording witness testimony in case S. Fo. K. No. 188/2024 involving illegal liquor (country liquor) seizure. The witness (Police Head Constable Nitin Balkrishna Jadhav) testified about the raid conducted on 31.05.2024 where 5 liters of country liquor was seized from the accused Narayan Sitaram Dalvi; cross-examination was completed and the testimony was admitted into the record by the presiding officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a criminal court document from Deorukh (Ratnagiri, Maharashtra) dated 10.03.2026, recording witness testimony in case S. Fo. K. No. 188/2024 involving illegal liquor (country liquor) seizure. The witness (Police Head Constable Nitin Balkrishna Jadhav) testified about the raid conducted on 31.05.2024 where 5 liters of country liquor was seized from the accused Narayan Sitaram Dalvi; cross-examination was completed and the testimony was admitted into the record by the presiding officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts