Vibhavari Gajanan Shetye previous- Ambu Shankar Khatu vs Amit Rajanikant Khatu, etc.8 Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram — 33/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 32,34,38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRT080002932022
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
60/2022
Filing Date
12-04-2022
Registration No
33/2022
Registration Date
12-04-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vibhavari Gajanan Shetye previous- Ambu Shankar Khatu
Adv. Murudkar Bhakti Sagar
Respondent(s)
Amit Rajanikant Khatu, etc.8 Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram
Prabha Rajanikant Khatu
Punam Devdatta Aadivare previous- Punam Rajanikan Khatu
Abhijit Anant Khatu
Adv. Shinde Rajesh Kashiram
Shamal Suhas Khatu
Sonali Ritesh Shetye previous- Sonali Suhas Khatu
Radha Rushikesh Patane previous- Rupali Suhas Khatu
Kalpana Balkrishna Shetye previous- Indu Shankar Khatu(Legal Heir)(Dead)
Kalpana Balkrushna Pawar(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 31-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgment |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Civil Suit No. 33/2022 - The court amended and clarified the issues to be decided in the case. The court modified two key issues: (1) whether defendants nos. 02 and 04 are causing obstruction to the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit properties, and (2) whether defendants nos. 01 and 04 can prove the plaintiff and her sisters relinquished their rights without consideration. The court also granted both parties additional opportunity to present evidence on the reformulated issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Civil Suit No. 33/2022 - The court amended and clarified the issues to be decided in the case. The court modified two key issues: (1) whether defendants nos. 02 and 04 are causing obstruction to the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit properties, and (2) whether defendants nos. 01 and 04 can prove the plaintiff and her sisters relinquished their rights without consideration. The court also granted both parties additional opportunity to present evidence on the reformulated issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts