State of Maharashtra Through Sangmeshwar Police Station vs Dattatray Krushan Kotavadekar Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram — 147/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT080002912024
Next Hearing
20th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
221/2024
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
147/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
FIR Details
FIR Number
33
Police Station
Sangmeshwar Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Sangmeshwar Police Station
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Dattatray Krushan Kotavadekar Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-11-2025 | Hearing | |
| 16-09-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Summary Criminal Case No. 147/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate, Deorukh, the court examined prosecution witness testimony regarding a motor accident involving a rickshaw and two-wheeler. The witness's testimony contained significant inconsistencies with his prior statement, which the defense counsel challenged through cross-examination. The court found the witness evidence contradictory and unreliable regarding the cause of the accident and the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Summary Criminal Case No. 147/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate, Deorukh, the court examined prosecution witness testimony regarding a motor accident involving a rickshaw and two-wheeler. The witness's testimony contained significant inconsistencies with his prior statement, which the defense counsel challenged through cross-examination. The court found the witness evidence contradictory and unreliable regarding the cause of the accident and the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts