State of Maharashtra Through Sangmeshwar Police Station vs Dattatray Krushan Kotavadekar Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram — 147/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRT080002912024

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

20th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

221/2024

Filing Date

03-07-2024

Registration No

147/2024

Registration Date

03-07-2024

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

Sangmeshwar Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279,337,338,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 184,

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Sangmeshwar Police Station

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Dattatray Krushan Kotavadekar Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

28-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

04-11-2025

Hearing

16-09-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

03-12-2024
Plea
18-12-2025
Evidence
18-12-2025
Evidence
10-03-2026
Evidence

Summary: In Summary Criminal Case No. 147/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate, Deorukh, the court examined prosecution witness testimony regarding a motor accident involving a rickshaw and two-wheeler. The witness's testimony contained significant inconsistencies with his prior statement, which the defense counsel challenged through cross-examination. The court found the witness evidence contradictory and unreliable regarding the cause of the accident and the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Summary Criminal Case No. 147/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate, Deorukh, the court examined prosecution witness testimony regarding a motor accident involving a rickshaw and two-wheeler. The witness's testimony contained significant inconsistencies with his prior statement, which the defense counsel challenged through cross-examination. The court found the witness evidence contradictory and unreliable regarding the cause of the accident and the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case