State of Maharashtra through Deorukh Police Station vs Pradip Pratap Pawar Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram — 74/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT080001802018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
139/2018
Filing Date
06-04-2018
Registration No
74/2018
Registration Date
06-04-2018
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
Deorukh Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through Deorukh Police Station
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Pradip Pratap Pawar Advocate - Shinde Rajesh Kashiram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-02-2026 | Judgment | |
| 13-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-12-2025 | Arguments | |
| 09-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted the defendant, Pradeep Pratap Pawar, of all charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, and the Motor Vehicles Act section 184. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accident on January 13, 2018, was caused by the defendant's rash or negligent driving, citing insufficient corroborative evidence and inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the accident details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted the defendant, Pradeep Pratap Pawar, of all charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, and the Motor Vehicles Act section 184. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accident on January 13, 2018, was caused by the defendant's rash or negligent driving, citing insufficient corroborative evidence and inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the accident details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts