Tukaram Ganpat Bait etc.2 vs Vandana Ganpat Bait Nee Archana Chandrakant Patade Advocate - Chavan Punam Chandrashekhar — 17/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRT080001202025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2025

Filing Number

28/2025

Filing Date

19-03-2025

Registration No

17/2025

Registration Date

19-03-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38,39

Petitioner(s)

Tukaram Ganpat Bait etc.2

Adv. Limbukar Chandrashekhar Vijay

Mohan Ganpat Bait

Adv. Rajesh Kashiram Shinde

Respondent(s)

Vandana Ganpat Bait Nee Archana Chandrakant Patade Advocate - Chavan Punam Chandrashekhar

Ramchandra Ganpat Bait.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

28-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

24-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

15-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

20-12-2025
Order on T.I.

Summary: The court partially granted the petitioner's plea (ावा निळकत - temple property dispute). The court ordered the respondent to remove the lock she placed on the temple room's door, either by keeping the key outside the door or by removing the lock entirely and reinstalling it on the door. The court also restrained the respondent from preventing the petitioner from performing prayers, conducting Ganesh festivals, and other religious activities in the disputed temple room, pending final judgment in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court partially granted the petitioner's plea (ावा निळकत - temple property dispute). The court ordered the respondent to remove the lock she placed on the temple room's door, either by keeping the key outside the door or by removing the lock entirely and reinstalling it on the door. The court also restrained the respondent from preventing the petitioner from performing prayers, conducting Ganesh festivals, and other religious activities in the disputed temple room, pending final judgment in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case