Tukaram Ganpat Bait etc.2 vs Vandana Ganpat Bait Nee Archana Chandrakant Patade Advocate - Chavan Punam Chandrashekhar — 17/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 05-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRT080001202025

e-Filing Number

18-03-2025

Filing Number

28/2025

Filing Date

19-Mar-2025

Registration No

17/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tukaram Ganpat Bait etc.2

    Adv. Limbukar Chandrashekhar Vijay

  2. 2.Mohan Ganpat Bait

    Adv. Rajesh Kashiram Shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vandana Ganpat Bait Nee Archana Chandrakant Patade Advocate - Chavan Punam Chandrashekhar

  2. 2.Ramchandra Ganpat Bait.

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  7. 01-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 20-Dec-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary: The court partially granted the petitioner's plea (ावा निळकत - temple property dispute). The court ordered the respondent to remove the lock she placed on the temple room's door, either by keeping the key outside the door or by removing the lock entirely and reinstalling it on the door. The court also restrained the respondent from preventing the petitioner from performing prayers, conducting Ganesh festivals, and other religious activities in the disputed temple room, pending final judgment in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  12. 29-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  13. 16-Oct-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  14. 30-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  16. 19-Aug-2025

    Reply Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  17. 07-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  18. 22-Jul-2025

    Filing of Vakilpatra_Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  20. 28-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

  21. 19-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 19-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court partially granted the petitioner's plea (ावा निळकत - temple property dispute). The court ordered the respondent to remove the lock she placed on the temple room's door, either by keeping the key outside the door or by removing the lock entirely and reinstalling it on the door. The court also restrained the respondent from preventing the petitioner from performing prayers, conducting Ganesh festivals, and other religious activities in the disputed temple room, pending final judgment in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case