State of Maharashtra Through Deorukh Police Station vs Santosh Ashok Mirajkar Advocate - Chavan Punam Chandrashekhar — 16/2021
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),27. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT080000632021
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
48/2021
Filing Date
29-01-2021
Registration No
16/2021
Registration Date
29-01-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
FIR Details
FIR Number
119
Police Station
Deorukh Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Deorukh Police Station
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Santosh Ashok Mirajkar Advocate - Chavan Punam Chandrashekhar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 14-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 22-09-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Marathi court order (FIR No. 16/2021, Case No. 28) from the Devrukhicourt dated January 17, 2025, documenting witness examination in a drug-related case. The court examined the prosecution's witness (Police Constable Sachin Suresh Bujbalrao) and the defendant's counsel cross-examined him, questioning procedural irregularities including lack of proper authorization documentation, absence of written evidence of consent refusal for body search, and discrepancies in drug seizure records. The case has been adjourned for continued cross-examination of the defendant's counsel at their oral request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Marathi court order (FIR No. 16/2021, Case No. 28) from the Devrukhicourt dated January 17, 2025, documenting witness examination in a drug-related case. The court examined the prosecution's witness (Police Constable Sachin Suresh Bujbalrao) and the defendant's counsel cross-examined him, questioning procedural irregularities including lack of proper authorization documentation, absence of written evidence of consent refusal for body search, and discrepancies in drug seizure records. The case has been adjourned for continued cross-examination of the defendant's counsel at their oral request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts