Santosh Dattaram Palye vs Manish Shridhar Damushte — 6/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7Rule(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRT080000562025
e-Filing Number
30-01-2025
Filing Number
9/2025
Filing Date
01-Feb-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
01-Feb-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Santosh Dattaram Palye
Adv. Shinde Rajesh Kashiram
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manish Shridhar Damushte
Case History
-
05-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
13-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
23-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Civil Judge's court at Devrukh rejected certain documentary evidence filed by the defendant. Specifically, IDBI Bank memos (Annexures 02-03) were inadmissible due to lack of signatures, and the photocopied Aadhar card (Annexure 08) was inadmissible as a photocopy. The court ordered that the remaining admissible documents (Annexures 01, 04-07) be marked as Exhibits 10-14 for evidentiary purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
17-Jul-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
12-Jun-2025
No W.S. Order
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
08-Apr-2025
Filing of Vakilpatra_Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
10-Mar-2025
Appearance
Joint Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Deorukh
-
01-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2025
Summary: The Civil Judge's court at Devrukh rejected certain documentary evidence filed by the defendant. Specifically, IDBI Bank memos (Annexures 02-03) were inadmissible due to lack of signatures, and the photocopied Aadhar card (Annexure 08) was inadmissible as a photocopy. The court ordered that the remaining admissible documents (Annexures 01, 04-07) be marked as Exhibits 10-14 for evidentiary purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts