State of Maharashtra vs Sandesh Devji More Advocate - None — 575/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT050011032022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
907/2022
Filing Date
18-11-2022
Registration No
575/2022
Registration Date
18-11-2022
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Khed
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
170
Police Station
State Excise, Khed.
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Sandesh Devji More Advocate - None
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Khed
Disposed
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 13-10-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 11-08-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 30-05-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sandesh Devji More (SCC 575/2022) The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC against the accused charged under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for illegal liquor possession. The court found that the prosecution's failure to produce the chemical analysis report—vital evidence to prove the seized substance was prohibited liquor—made it impossible to establish the offense's essential ingredients. The accused was released and the case disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sandesh Devji More (SCC 575/2022) The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC against the accused charged under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for illegal liquor possession. The court found that the prosecution's failure to produce the chemical analysis report—vital evidence to prove the seized substance was prohibited liquor—made it impossible to establish the offense's essential ingredients. The accused was released and the case disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts