Kunda Pandurang More etc. 3 vs Pravin Pandurang More etc. 4 Advocate - S. Jadhav — 69/2022
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRT050009402022
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
160/2022
Filing Date
22-09-2022
Registration No
69/2022
Registration Date
23-09-2022
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Khed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kunda Pandurang More etc. 3
Adv. Gandhi Abhijit Prabhakar
Prashant Pandurang More
Adv. Gandhi Abhijit Prabhakar
Smita Mangesh Ambre
Adv. Gandhi Abhijit Prabhakar
Respondent(s)
Pravin Pandurang More etc. 4 Advocate - S. Jadhav
Punam Rajendra Shinde
Adv. None
Pallavi Pandurang More
Adv. None
Sachin Pandurang More
Adv. None-MAH/0000/2099
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Khed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 05-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: CMA No. 69/2022, 2nd Joint Civil Judge & JMFC, Khed, Ratnagiri District Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the applicant's claim seeking succession rights to the property of deceased Pandurang Rao More, finding that the applicant failed to establish legal heirship and that the property falls under the jurisdiction of a different court where succession matters must be properly decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: CMA No. 69/2022, 2nd Joint Civil Judge & JMFC, Khed, Ratnagiri District Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the applicant's claim seeking succession rights to the property of deceased Pandurang Rao More, finding that the applicant failed to establish legal heirship and that the property falls under the jurisdiction of a different court where succession matters must be properly decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts