State of Maharashtra vs Dinesh Mahipat Jabare Advocate - Khedekar Kaushubh Kashiram — 533/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT050008802023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
758/2023
Filing Date
29-09-2023
Registration No
533/2023
Registration Date
29-09-2023
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Khed
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
137
Police Station
State Excise, Khed.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Dinesh Mahipat Jabare Advocate - Khedekar Kaushubh Kashiram
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Khed
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 15-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-07-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-05-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Khed First Class Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, finding him guilty of illegally possessing and selling alcohol on July 9, 2023. The court acquitted him of charges under CrPC Section 437-A due to insufficient evidence of intent to distribute, but ordered his release on personal and surety bonds of Rs. 5,000 each, along with seizure and disposal of confiscated alcohol stocks per state excise authority procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Khed First Class Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, finding him guilty of illegally possessing and selling alcohol on July 9, 2023. The court acquitted him of charges under CrPC Section 437-A due to insufficient evidence of intent to distribute, but ordered his release on personal and surety bonds of Rs. 5,000 each, along with seizure and disposal of confiscated alcohol stocks per state excise authority procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts