Kum. Bhakti Subhash Pawar etc.2 vs Canara Bank etc.6 Advocate - None — 500056/2010

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRT050008572010

Awaiting Notice

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

500056/2010

Filing Date

01-10-2010

Registration No

500056/2010

Registration Date

01-10-2010

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed

Judge

2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Kum. Bhakti Subhash Pawar etc.2

Adv. Butala Sudhir Sharad

Sidhesh Subhash Pawar

Adv. None

Respondent(s)

Canara Bank etc.6 Advocate - None

Me Eltek Fine kem Pra. Ltd.

Adv. None

Dattajirao Govind Ambre(Legal Heir)

Adv. None

Vikrant Dattajirao Ambre

Adv. None

Sanjay Dattajirao Ambre

Adv. None

Subhash Sakharam Pawar

Adv. None

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

09-04-2026

Awaiting Notice

10-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

13-02-2026

Awaiting Notice

03-01-2026

Awaiting Notice

03-12-2025

Steps_Unready

Interim Orders

20-10-2010
Order Number 1
13-02-2013
Order Number 2
02-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court allowed three petitions (Exhibits 46, 48, and 50) filed by the plaintiff seeking to include the deceased defendant's (Respondent No. 3, died 15.01.2019) heirs/legal representatives on record, waived the 2058-day delay in doing so, and permitted the plaintiff to amend the case record within one week to reflect this change. The suit would now proceed against the defendant's heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed three petitions (Exhibits 46, 48, and 50) filed by the plaintiff seeking to include the deceased defendant's (Respondent No. 3, died 15.01.2019) heirs/legal representatives on record, waived the 2058-day delay in doing so, and permitted the plaintiff to amend the case record within one week to reflect this change. The suit would now proceed against the defendant's heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case