Shri Satish Bhargav More vs Nirmal Group Garmpanchyat VeralJamburde Advocate - None — 500089/2014

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRT050007952014

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

500126/2014

Filing Date

27-11-2014

Registration No

500089/2014

Registration Date

27-11-2014

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed

Judge

2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 39

Petitioner(s)

Shri Satish Bhargav More

Adv. Devrukhakar Nitu Laxman

Respondent(s)

Nirmal Group Garmpanchyat VeralJamburde Advocate - None

Sayatam Gruhanirman Sahakari Sanstha Through Sadanand Laxman Bhosale

Adv. Damale Prafulla Anant

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

29-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

02-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

13-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

29-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Interim Orders

14-10-2015
Order on T.I.
08-08-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The petition filed under Rule 127 was allowed with conditions. The plaintiff is required to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the defendant, after which the court's previous order dated 07.07.2025 denying cross-examination rights will be set aside, and the witness Diwakar Prabhu will be allowed to be cross-examined by the defendant's counsel. The delay in granting cross-examination was remedied by imposing cost as compensation to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed under Rule 127 was allowed with conditions. The plaintiff is required to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the defendant, after which the court's previous order dated 07.07.2025 denying cross-examination rights will be set aside, and the witness Diwakar Prabhu will be allowed to be cross-examined by the defendant's counsel. The delay in granting cross-examination was remedied by imposing cost as compensation to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case