Smt Vasanti Keshav Ambre etc 1 vs Shri. Sandip Balkrishna Ambre etc 2 Advocate - Damale Prafulla Anant — 79/2016
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Disposed: Contested--SUIT DISMISSED, COUNTER CLAIM DECREED on 06th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRT050007542016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
133/2016
Filing Date
05-11-2016
Registration No
79/2016
Registration Date
05-11-2016
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--SUIT DISMISSED, COUNTER CLAIM DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Vasanti Keshav Ambre etc 1
Adv. Jadkar Milind Narayan
Mrs. Gita Keshav Ambre
Adv. Jadkar Milind Narayan
Respondent(s)
Shri. Sandip Balkrishna Ambre etc 2 Advocate - Damale Prafulla Anant
Shri. Suresh Dadu Gharal
Adv. Damale Prafulla Anant
Smt. Shevanti Mahadev Ambre
Adv. Damale Prafulla Anant
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiffs' case challenging a property sale deed dated 20.07.2015 as illegal and unenforceable. The court found that the property had been legally partitioned in an earlier 1994 civil suit, and defendant No. 1 legitimately acquired full ownership and possession of the disputed property through registered sales documents; accordingly, the sale deed remained valid and binding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiffs' case challenging a property sale deed dated 20.07.2015 as illegal and unenforceable. The court found that the property had been legally partitioned in an earlier 1994 civil suit, and defendant No. 1 legitimately acquired full ownership and possession of the disputed property through registered sales documents; accordingly, the sale deed remained valid and binding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts