State of Maharashtra vs Sanjay Chimanu Deshmukh Advocate - Sheth Sameer Sharad — 392/2022

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRT050007272022

Filing Number

593/2022

Filing Date

18-Jul-2022

Registration No

392/2022

Registration Date

18-Jul-2022

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed

Judge

2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

194

Police Station

Police Station Khed

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Chimanu Deshmukh Advocate - Sheth Sameer Sharad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted defendant Sanjay Chimrnu Deshmukh of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite having only one witness. The court noted that the prosecution could not establish the gambling offense through adequate testimony and documentary evidence, resulting in the defendant's complete acquittal. Additionally, the court ordered seized cash of Rs. 1,285 to be deposited with the government after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  7. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  9. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  10. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  11. 23-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  12. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  13. 15-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  14. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  15. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  16. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  17. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  18. 06-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  19. 21-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  20. 26-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  21. 11-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  22. 20-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  23. 22-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  24. 13-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  25. 16-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  26. 09-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  27. 19-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  28. 04-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

  29. 18-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 18-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 392/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted defendant Sanjay Chimrnu Deshmukh of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite having only one witness. The court noted that the prosecution could not establish the gambling offense through adequate testimony and documentary evidence, resulting in the defendant's complete acquittal. Additionally, the court ordered seized cash of Rs. 1,285 to be deposited with the government after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case