State of Maharashtra vs Sanjay Chimanu Deshmukh Advocate - Sheth Sameer Sharad — 392/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT050007272022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
593/2022
Filing Date
18-07-2022
Registration No
392/2022
Registration Date
18-07-2022
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
194
Police Station
Police Station Khed
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Chimanu Deshmukh Advocate - Sheth Sameer Sharad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted defendant Sanjay Chimrnu Deshmukh of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite having only one witness. The court noted that the prosecution could not establish the gambling offense through adequate testimony and documentary evidence, resulting in the defendant's complete acquittal. Additionally, the court ordered seized cash of Rs. 1,285 to be deposited with the government after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted defendant Sanjay Chimrnu Deshmukh of charges under the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite having only one witness. The court noted that the prosecution could not establish the gambling offense through adequate testimony and documentary evidence, resulting in the defendant's complete acquittal. Additionally, the court ordered seized cash of Rs. 1,285 to be deposited with the government after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts