Bashir Shamsuddin Sange vs Wajuddin Ahamad Maroof etc. 5 Advocate - None — 169/2020
Case under Epidemic Diseases Act Section 2,3(188). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT050003492020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
299/2020
Filing Date
18-06-2020
Registration No
169/2020
Registration Date
18-06-2020
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bashir Shamsuddin Sange
Adv. Jagtap Amol Ashok
Respondent(s)
Wajuddin Ahamad Maroof etc. 5 Advocate - None
Liyakat Salauddin Sange
Adv. None
Aslam Rashid Parkar
Adv. None
Basharat A. Rahiman Parkar
Adv. None
Sawood Ahamad Parkar
Adv. None
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 26-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 14-10-2025 | Reply/Say | |
| 20-08-2025 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Khed acquitted the accused under Section 256 of the Cr.P.C. in a private complaint case between Bashir Shamsuddin Sanage and Wajuddin Ahamad Maroof, because the complainant repeatedly failed to appear before the court despite multiple dates being set. The complaint was disposed of and the accused were acquitted due to the complainant's non-appearance when his presence was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Khed acquitted the accused under Section 256 of the Cr.P.C. in a private complaint case between Bashir Shamsuddin Sanage and Wajuddin Ahamad Maroof, because the complainant repeatedly failed to appear before the court despite multiple dates being set. The complaint was disposed of and the accused were acquitted due to the complainant's non-appearance when his presence was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts