State of Maharashtra vs Avinash Narayan Chavan Advocate - Sheth Sameer Sharad — 180/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT050003252024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
255/2024
Filing Date
19-04-2024
Registration No
180/2024
Registration Date
19-04-2024
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
100
Police Station
Police Station Khed
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Avinash Narayan Chavan Advocate - Sheth Sameer Sharad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 05-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 12-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 11-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Abhinash Narayana Chavhan, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that while illicit liquor was seized, the prosecution failed to produce the chemical analysis report proving the seized material was alcohol, making the charges unproven beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was acquitted and the seized contraband was ordered destroyed after appeal periods lapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Abhinash Narayana Chavhan, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that while illicit liquor was seized, the prosecution failed to produce the chemical analysis report proving the seized material was alcohol, making the charges unproven beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was acquitted and the seized contraband was ordered destroyed after appeal periods lapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts