Dattaraj Ramchandra Chandiwade vs Yogesh Krushnant Satpute Advocate - Bhosale Ashwin Shahu — 182/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRT050002952019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
252/2019
Filing Date
14-03-2019
Registration No
182/2019
Registration Date
14-03-2019
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Khed
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattaraj Ramchandra Chandiwade
Adv. Gandhi Abhijit Prabhakar
Respondent(s)
Yogesh Krushnant Satpute Advocate - Bhosale Ashwin Shahu
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Khed
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-02-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 27-01-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 15-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate dismissed a five-year-old cheque bounce complaint (under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) against Yogesh Krushnant Satpute for want of prosecution, as the complainant failed to appear despite sufficient opportunities granted by the court. The accused was acquitted and his bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate dismissed a five-year-old cheque bounce complaint (under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) against Yogesh Krushnant Satpute for want of prosecution, as the complainant failed to appear despite sufficient opportunities granted by the court. The accused was acquitted and his bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts