Shri Atmaram Pandurang Sutar vs Sangita Mahadev Kanekar etc.5 Thorugh Leagal Heirs Sandip Mahadev Kanekar Advocate - Bhosale Ashwin Shahu — 34/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRT050002272024
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
15-03-2024
Filing Number
56/2024
Filing Date
20-03-2024
Registration No
34/2024
Registration Date
20-03-2024
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri Atmaram Pandurang Sutar
Adv. Dafle Tukaram Laxman
Respondent(s)
Sangita Mahadev Kanekar etc.5 Thorugh Leagal Heirs Sandip Mahadev Kanekar Advocate - Bhosale Ashwin Shahu
Balkrushna Pandurang Sutar(Legal Heir)
Adv. None
Mahadev Pandurang Sutar(Legal Heir)
Adv. None
Pandurang Babu Sutar(Legal Heir)
Adv. None
Prabhavati Gopichand Kanekar(Legal Heir)
Adv. None
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Awaiting Summons
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 05-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 30-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 06-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The court allowed three petitions filed by the petitioner to add the heirs of deceased respondent Mukund Pandurang Sutar (Respondent 4-D) to the case records and to condone the 139-day delay in doing so. The court permitted necessary corrections to the case file and directed that the corrected records be submitted to the court and served on the opposing party within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The court allowed three petitions filed by the petitioner to add the heirs of deceased respondent Mukund Pandurang Sutar (Respondent 4-D) to the case records and to condone the 139-day delay in doing so. The court permitted necessary corrections to the case file and directed that the corrected records be submitted to the court and served on the opposing party within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts