Shri Atmaram Pandurang Sutar vs Sangita Mahadev Kanekar etc.5 Thorugh Leagal Heirs Sandip Mahadev Kanekar Advocate - Bhosale Ashwin Shahu — 34/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRT050002272024

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

15-03-2024

Filing Number

56/2024

Filing Date

20-03-2024

Registration No

34/2024

Registration Date

20-03-2024

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed

Judge

2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9
Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Shri Atmaram Pandurang Sutar

Adv. Dafle Tukaram Laxman

Respondent(s)

Sangita Mahadev Kanekar etc.5 Thorugh Leagal Heirs Sandip Mahadev Kanekar Advocate - Bhosale Ashwin Shahu

Balkrushna Pandurang Sutar(Legal Heir)

Adv. None

Mahadev Pandurang Sutar(Legal Heir)

Adv. None

Pandurang Babu Sutar(Legal Heir)

Adv. None

Prabhavati Gopichand Kanekar(Legal Heir)

Adv. None

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

16-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

05-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

30-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

06-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

27-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Court Order Summary The court allowed three petitions filed by the petitioner to add the heirs of deceased respondent Mukund Pandurang Sutar (Respondent 4-D) to the case records and to condone the 139-day delay in doing so. The court permitted necessary corrections to the case file and directed that the corrected records be submitted to the court and served on the opposing party within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The court allowed three petitions filed by the petitioner to add the heirs of deceased respondent Mukund Pandurang Sutar (Respondent 4-D) to the case records and to condone the 139-day delay in doing so. The court permitted necessary corrections to the case file and directed that the corrected records be submitted to the court and served on the opposing party within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case