Illiyas Ismail Panhalkar vs Younus Ibrahim Parkar Advocate - None — 111/2020

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRT050001982020

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

173/2020

Filing Date

24-02-2020

Registration No

111/2020

Registration Date

24-02-2020

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed

Judge

3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Khed

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

Illiyas Ismail Panhalkar

Adv. Chikane Sandesh Ganpat

Respondent(s)

Younus Ibrahim Parkar Advocate - None

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Khed

10-03-2026

Disposed

21-02-2026

Dismissal Order

17-01-2026

Dismissal Order

12-12-2025

Dismissal Order

08-12-2025

Dismissal Order

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Judicial Magistrate dismissed a cheque bounce complaint (Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Illiyas Ismail Panhalkar against Younus Ibrahim Parkar for want of prosecution under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The complainant failed to appear on the hearing date without filing any exemption or adjournment application, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the matter despite adequate opportunities over 5+ years. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and his bail bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate dismissed a cheque bounce complaint (Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Illiyas Ismail Panhalkar against Younus Ibrahim Parkar for want of prosecution under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The complainant failed to appear on the hearing date without filing any exemption or adjournment application, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the matter despite adequate opportunities over 5+ years. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and his bail bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case