Rakesh Babaram Dhebe vs The State of Maharashtra Thorugh khed Police Station Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 1/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRT050000052026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

01-01-2026

Filing Number

5/2026

Filing Date

02-01-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

02-01-2026

Court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed

Judge

2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Rakesh Babaram Dhebe

Adv. Farman Metkar

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra Thorugh khed Police Station Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed

10-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Order on Exh

04-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

17-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

09-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court granted the petitioner's application for interim custody of four seized bulls under Section 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. The investigating officer's testimony confirmed the bulls belonged to the petitioner, and the court found no evidence linking him to the criminal case, determining the animals would be safer with the petitioner than with the respondent animal shelter (Caretaker No. 2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the petitioner's application for interim custody of four seized bulls under Section 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. The investigating officer's testimony confirmed the bulls belonged to the petitioner, and the court found no evidence linking him to the criminal case, determining the animals would be safer with the petitioner than with the respondent animal shelter (Caretaker No. 2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case