Shriram Krushnrao Vichare vs Land Acquation Officer Kokan Railway, Ratnagiri Etc 2 Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 9/2019
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 23,. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
L.R.DKST. - Execution of Land Reference Award
CNR: MHRT040006382019
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
339/2019
Filing Date
02-08-2019
Registration No
9/2019
Registration Date
02-08-2019
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Khed.
Judge
3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge Khed.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram Krushnrao Vichare
Adv. Jadkar Milind Narayan
Respondent(s)
Land Acquation Officer Kokan Railway, Ratnagiri Etc 2 Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor
Exeutive Enginner Irigation Department, Chiplun
Adv. None
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge Khed.
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 15-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Steps_Unready | |
| 03-02-2026 | Steps_Unready | |
| 20-01-2026 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Judge granted the Government a two-month extension to pay the decretal amount in the case of Shriram Krusharao Vichare vs. S.L.A.O. Konkan Railway Ratnagiri, rejecting the requested three-month period. The court acknowledged administrative compliance reasons but found that adequate opportunities had already been provided over six years and ordered expeditious payment to prevent further interest accumulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Judge granted the Government a two-month extension to pay the decretal amount in the case of Shriram Krusharao Vichare vs. S.L.A.O. Konkan Railway Ratnagiri, rejecting the requested three-month period. The court acknowledged administrative compliance reasons but found that adequate opportunities had already been provided over six years and ordered expeditious payment to prevent further interest accumulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts