Sumit Baban Nikam Through Legal Guardian Mother Bharti Baban Nikam vs Ramkrishana Krishana Sabale Etc 2 Advocate - None — 85/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP. M.A. - Misc. Application in Motor Accident Claims

CNR: MHRT040005552025

e-Filing Number

06-11-2025

Filing Number

362/2025

Filing Date

06-Nov-2025

Registration No

85/2025

Registration Date

06-Nov-2025

Court

District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Khed.

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Khed.

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sumit Baban Nikam Through Legal Guardian Mother Bharti Baban Nikam

    Adv. Siddhi Anant Khedekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramkrishana Krishana Sabale Etc 2 Advocate - None

  2. 2.Yashraj Ramkrishna Sabale Through Legal Guardian Father Ramkrishna Krishna Sabale

    Adv. None

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) Khed allowed the application and condoned the delay of 257 days in filing the motor accident compensation claim under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court found sufficient reason for the delay, noting that the applicant (a minor injured in a motorcycle accident on 23-08-2024) was undergoing medical treatment and had previously filed a related application within the statutory period, with tribunal permission to file separately. The court directed registration of the compensation application, applying the liberal interpretation principle of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in favor of the injured party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Khed.

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Khed.

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Filing of Vakilpatra_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Khed.

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Filing of Vakilpatra_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Khed.

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Filing of Vakilpatra_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Khed.

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Filing of Vakilpatra_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Khed.

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Khed.

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 06-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) Khed allowed the application and condoned the delay of 257 days in filing the motor accident compensation claim under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court found sufficient reason for the delay, noting that the applicant (a minor injured in a motorcycle accident on 23-08-2024) was undergoing medical treatment and had previously filed a related application within the statutory period, with tribunal permission to file separately. The court directed registration of the compensation application, applying the liberal interpretation principle of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in favor of the injured party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case