Mahesh Dagadu Gurav vs Police Inspector, Ratnagiri City Police Station etc. — 260/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRT030019892025
e-Filing Number
11-12-2025
Filing Number
1989/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
260/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ratnagiri
Judge
3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahesh Dagadu Gurav
Adv. Tharwal Sachin Sudhir
Respondent(s)
Police Inspector, Ratnagiri City Police Station etc.
Bal Krushna Kshirsagar
Shital Bal Kshirsagar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 05-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Ratnagiri Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Court granted Mahesh Dagdu Gurv's petition under Section 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, ordering the return of his wife's gold mangalsutra (55 grams with black beads) seized during a theft investigation, upon furnishing a bond of ₹3,50,000. The court rejected the prosecution's objections regarding weight discrepancies and lack of original purchase bill, noting that long-retained seized articles should not be unnecessarily withheld and citing Supreme Court precedent that such property must be released on appropriate conditions to the rightful owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Ratnagiri Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Court granted Mahesh Dagdu Gurv's petition under Section 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, ordering the return of his wife's gold mangalsutra (55 grams with black beads) seized during a theft investigation, upon furnishing a bond of ₹3,50,000. The court rejected the prosecution's objections regarding weight discrepancies and lack of original purchase bill, noting that long-retained seized articles should not be unnecessarily withheld and citing Supreme Court precedent that such property must be released on appropriate conditions to the rightful owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts