Mahesh Dagadu Gurav vs Police Inspector, Ratnagiri City Police Station etc. — 260/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRT030019892025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-12-2025

Filing Number

1989/2025

Filing Date

16-12-2025

Registration No

260/2025

Registration Date

16-12-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ratnagiri

Judge

3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Mahesh Dagadu Gurav

Adv. Tharwal Sachin Sudhir

Respondent(s)

Police Inspector, Ratnagiri City Police Station etc.

Bal Krushna Kshirsagar

Shital Bal Kshirsagar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Court Summary The Ratnagiri Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Court granted Mahesh Dagdu Gurv's petition under Section 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, ordering the return of his wife's gold mangalsutra (55 grams with black beads) seized during a theft investigation, upon furnishing a bond of ₹3,50,000. The court rejected the prosecution's objections regarding weight discrepancies and lack of original purchase bill, noting that long-retained seized articles should not be unnecessarily withheld and citing Supreme Court precedent that such property must be released on appropriate conditions to the rightful owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Ratnagiri Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Court granted Mahesh Dagdu Gurv's petition under Section 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, ordering the return of his wife's gold mangalsutra (55 grams with black beads) seized during a theft investigation, upon furnishing a bond of ₹3,50,000. The court rejected the prosecution's objections regarding weight discrepancies and lack of original purchase bill, noting that long-retained seized articles should not be unnecessarily withheld and citing Supreme Court precedent that such property must be released on appropriate conditions to the rightful owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ratnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case