State of Maharashtra vs Ravindra Tanaji Shitap — 1039/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRT030014922024

Filing Number

1491/2024

Filing Date

20-Sep-2024

Registration No

1039/2024

Registration Date

20-Sep-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ratnagiri

Judge

3-2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

136

Police Station

Ratnagiri Rural Police Station Ratnagiri.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ravindra Tanaji Shitap

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The First Grade Judicial Magistrate Court at Ratnagiri acquitted defendant Ravindra Tanaji Shitap of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of 5 liters of country liquor on July 30, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with credible evidence, noting critical gaps such as the absence of eyewitnesses to the alleged incident, inconsistencies in the seizure procedure, and questionable chain of custody for the seized material, which cast doubt on whether the crime was actually committed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  10. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  11. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  12. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  13. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  14. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    B.W._Unready

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  16. 11-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  17. 26-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  18. 29-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  19. 13-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  20. 25-Feb-2025

    Filing of Surety

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  21. 30-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  22. 15-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  23. 25-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2Nd Judicial Magistrate F.C. Ratnagiri

  24. 27-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 20-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1039/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Grade Judicial Magistrate Court at Ratnagiri acquitted defendant Ravindra Tanaji Shitap of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of 5 liters of country liquor on July 30, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with credible evidence, noting critical gaps such as the absence of eyewitnesses to the alleged incident, inconsistencies in the seizure procedure, and questionable chain of custody for the seized material, which cast doubt on whether the crime was actually committed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case