State of Maharashtra vs Ravindra Tanaji Shitap — 1039/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRT030014922024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1491/2024

Filing Date

20-09-2024

Registration No

1039/2024

Registration Date

20-09-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ratnagiri

Judge

3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

136

Police Station

Ratnagiri Rural Police Station Ratnagiri.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Ravindra Tanaji Shitap

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

24-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

18-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

13-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The First Grade Judicial Magistrate Court at Ratnagiri acquitted defendant Ravindra Tanaji Shitap of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of 5 liters of country liquor on July 30, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with credible evidence, noting critical gaps such as the absence of eyewitnesses to the alleged incident, inconsistencies in the seizure procedure, and questionable chain of custody for the seized material, which cast doubt on whether the crime was actually committed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Grade Judicial Magistrate Court at Ratnagiri acquitted defendant Ravindra Tanaji Shitap of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession of 5 liters of country liquor on July 30, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with credible evidence, noting critical gaps such as the absence of eyewitnesses to the alleged incident, inconsistencies in the seizure procedure, and questionable chain of custody for the seized material, which cast doubt on whether the crime was actually committed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ratnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case