TANAJI GANPATI CHAVAN vs Police Inspector, Ratnagiri Rural Police Station, Tal.Dist.Ratnagiri etc. — 15/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 01st April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRT030000812026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
81/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ratnagiri
Judge
3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TANAJI GANPATI CHAVAN
Adv. Shaikh Suhail Salim
Respondent(s)
Police Inspector, Ratnagiri Rural Police Station, Tal.Dist.Ratnagiri etc.
Rushikesh Dilip Khonge
Avinash Suresh Gosavi
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted the petitioner's plea under CrPC Section 503, ordering the return of seized animals to the petitioner (Tanaraji Ganpati Chavan) on a conditional basis. The court found that the petitioner, a farmer, established ownership of the animals through agricultural records (7/12 extracts), and determined that prolonged detention of the animals in a shelter was impractical while the case proceeded. The court imposed conditions including a ₹50,000 bond, daily maintenance charges of ₹100, and restrictions on selling or transferring the animals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted the petitioner's plea under CrPC Section 503, ordering the return of seized animals to the petitioner (Tanaraji Ganpati Chavan) on a conditional basis. The court found that the petitioner, a farmer, established ownership of the animals through agricultural records (7/12 extracts), and determined that prolonged detention of the animals in a shelter was impractical while the case proceeded. The court imposed conditions including a ₹50,000 bond, daily maintenance charges of ₹100, and restrictions on selling or transferring the animals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts