Chaitali Sunil Bhagwat vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector, Ratnagiri City Police Station — 9/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRT030000522026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

31-12-2025

Filing Number

52/2026

Filing Date

09-01-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

09-01-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ratnagiri

Judge

3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Chaitali Sunil Bhagwat

Adv. Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector, Ratnagiri City Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Compliance

07-03-2026

Compliance

02-03-2026

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Ratnagiri Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant Chaitali Sunil Bhagwat's application and ordered the return of Rs. 30,735/- and Rs. 197.99/- held by police during a cyber crime investigation. The court found the applicant to be a cyber fraud victim based on her timely complaint, UPI transaction records, and the Investigating Officer's lack of objection to release the funds. The release is conditional upon the applicant providing a written undertaking that she will remit the amount to the court if any third party establishes a better claim within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Ratnagiri Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant Chaitali Sunil Bhagwat's application and ordered the return of Rs. 30,735/- and Rs. 197.99/- held by police during a cyber crime investigation. The court found the applicant to be a cyber fraud victim based on her timely complaint, UPI transaction records, and the Investigating Officer's lack of objection to release the funds. The release is conditional upon the applicant providing a written undertaking that she will remit the amount to the court if any third party establishes a better claim within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ratnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case