Chaitali Sunil Bhagwat vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector, Ratnagiri City Police Station — 9/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRT030000522026
e-Filing Number
31-12-2025
Filing Number
52/2026
Filing Date
09-01-2026
Registration No
9/2026
Registration Date
09-01-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Ratnagiri
Judge
3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chaitali Sunil Bhagwat
Adv. Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector, Ratnagiri City Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2ND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE F.C. RATNAGIRI
Disposed
Arguments
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Compliance | |
| 07-03-2026 | Compliance | |
| 02-03-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Ratnagiri Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant Chaitali Sunil Bhagwat's application and ordered the return of Rs. 30,735/- and Rs. 197.99/- held by police during a cyber crime investigation. The court found the applicant to be a cyber fraud victim based on her timely complaint, UPI transaction records, and the Investigating Officer's lack of objection to release the funds. The release is conditional upon the applicant providing a written undertaking that she will remit the amount to the court if any third party establishes a better claim within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Ratnagiri Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant Chaitali Sunil Bhagwat's application and ordered the return of Rs. 30,735/- and Rs. 197.99/- held by police during a cyber crime investigation. The court found the applicant to be a cyber fraud victim based on her timely complaint, UPI transaction records, and the Investigating Officer's lack of objection to release the funds. The release is conditional upon the applicant providing a written undertaking that she will remit the amount to the court if any third party establishes a better claim within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts