Bhimrav Vasant Kamble vs Sarika Bhimrav Kamble etc.6 Advocate - Pawar Prathiba Jayram — 40/2024
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRT010010882024
e-Filing Number
11-12-2024
Filing Number
293/2024
Filing Date
11-Dec-2024
Registration No
40/2024
Registration Date
12-Dec-2024
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 30-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhimrav Vasant Kamble
Adv. Tharwal Sachin Sudhir
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sarika Bhimrav Kamble etc.6 Advocate - Pawar Prathiba Jayram
-
2.Shruti Bhimrav Kamble Through Guardian Mother Sarika Bhimrav Kamble
Adv. Pawar Prathiba Jayram
-
3.Shreya Bhimrav Kamble Through Guardian Mother Sarika Bhimrav Kamble
Adv. Pawar Prathiba Jayram
-
4.Shravani Bhimrav Kamble Through Guardian Mother Sarika Bhimrav Kamble
Adv. Pawar Prathiba Jayram
-
5.Vaishali Vasant Kamble
Adv. Tharwal Sachin Sudhir
-
6.Vasant Heera Kamble
Adv. Tharwal Sachin Sudhir
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Sessions Court, Ratnagiri granted a delay condonation petition and approved a 37-day delay in filing an appeal against an interim order in a domestic violence protection case (Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Case No. 11/2021). The court condoned the delay based on the petitioner's employment obligations, subsequent harassment by the respondent, and medical documentation supporting the reasons for the delay, while imposing a cost of ₹1,200 to be paid by the petitioner to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
13-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
04-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
16-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
12-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
19-Nov-2025
Arguments
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
28-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
17-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
28-Aug-2025
Hearing
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
13-Aug-2025
Hearing
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
14-Jul-2025
Hearing
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
25-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
24-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
09-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
29-Mar-2025
Report
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
06-Mar-2025
Report
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
12-Feb-2025
Filing Of V.P.
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
22-Jan-2025
Filing Of V.P.
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
06-Jan-2025
Filing Of V.P.
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
26-Dec-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
-
12-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2024
The Sessions Court, Ratnagiri granted a delay condonation petition and approved a 37-day delay in filing an appeal against an interim order in a domestic violence protection case (Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Case No. 11/2021). The court condoned the delay based on the petitioner's employment obligations, subsequent harassment by the respondent, and medical documentation supporting the reasons for the delay, while imposing a cost of ₹1,200 to be paid by the petitioner to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts