Sunil Rajaram Kharade vs Ganeshi Sunil Kharade Before Marriage Ganeshi Sitaram Vaishnav Advocate - Pawar Prathiba Jayram — 61/2024
Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section 7,25. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRT010009652024
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
22-10-2024
Filing Number
754/2024
Filing Date
22-10-2024
Registration No
61/2024
Registration Date
21-11-2024
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Rajaram Kharade
Adv. Parkar Sachin Ramesh
Respondent(s)
Ganeshi Sunil Kharade Before Marriage Ganeshi Sitaram Vaishnav Advocate - Pawar Prathiba Jayram
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: Both applications (Exh. 32 and 35) in this child custody matter are disposed of. The court directed the parties to strictly comply with the interim custody order dated 03.02.2025 (allowing the father two days custody per month) until final disposal of the main custody application, rejecting the mother's non-compliance claims as evasive. The parties are further directed to submit suitable dates for the child to be interviewed by the court so the matter can be heard finally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Both applications (Exh. 32 and 35) in this child custody matter are disposed of. The court directed the parties to strictly comply with the interim custody order dated 03.02.2025 (allowing the father two days custody per month) until final disposal of the main custody application, rejecting the mother's non-compliance claims as evasive. The parties are further directed to submit suitable dates for the child to be interviewed by the court so the matter can be heard finally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts