Pradip Sahadev Kotre vs Sant Santaji Maharaj Jagnade Co Op Patsanstha Through Director Advocate - Solkar Amitkumar Anant — 30/2024

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRT010008332024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

21-09-2024

Filing Number

216/2024

Filing Date

21-09-2024

Registration No

30/2024

Registration Date

24-09-2024

Court

District and session court , Ratnagiri

Judge

1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Pradip Sahadev Kotre

Adv. Sawantdesai Kushal Kamlakar

Respondent(s)

Sant Santaji Maharaj Jagnade Co Op Patsanstha Through Director Advocate - Solkar Amitkumar Anant

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.

24-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

16-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, allowed the applicant's plea for condonation of 307 days delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, citing the applicant's illiteracy, custody status, and lack of legal awareness, outweighing the respondent's objections. The appeal was permitted on payment of Rs. 3,000 costs, with parties directed to appear on 20.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, allowed the applicant's plea for condonation of 307 days delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, citing the applicant's illiteracy, custody status, and lack of legal awareness, outweighing the respondent's objections. The appeal was permitted on payment of Rs. 3,000 costs, with parties directed to appear on 20.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and session court , Ratnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case