Pradip Sahadev Kotre vs Sant Santaji Maharaj Jagnade Co Op Patsanstha Through Director Advocate - Solkar Amitkumar Anant — 30/2024
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRT010008332024
e-Filing Number
21-09-2024
Filing Number
216/2024
Filing Date
21-09-2024
Registration No
30/2024
Registration Date
24-09-2024
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pradip Sahadev Kotre
Adv. Sawantdesai Kushal Kamlakar
Respondent(s)
Sant Santaji Maharaj Jagnade Co Op Patsanstha Through Director Advocate - Solkar Amitkumar Anant
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, allowed the applicant's plea for condonation of 307 days delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, citing the applicant's illiteracy, custody status, and lack of legal awareness, outweighing the respondent's objections. The appeal was permitted on payment of Rs. 3,000 costs, with parties directed to appear on 20.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, allowed the applicant's plea for condonation of 307 days delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, citing the applicant's illiteracy, custody status, and lack of legal awareness, outweighing the respondent's objections. The appeal was permitted on payment of Rs. 3,000 costs, with parties directed to appear on 20.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts