State of Maharashtra vs Mohasin Dastagir Nadaf Advocate - Shaikh Suhail Salim — 48/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(i),75(2),78(2),329(4),332(a),351(3),352,. Status: Fixing date of Hearing. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRT010007992025
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
332/2025
Filing Date
25-11-2025
Registration No
48/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
FIR Details
FIR Number
394
Police Station
Ratnagiri City Police Station Ratnagiri.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Salvi Prafulla Ramchandra
Respondent(s)
Mohasin Dastagir Nadaf Advocate - Shaikh Suhail Salim
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing | |
| 17-03-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing | |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 11-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
BAIL DENIED The Special Court, Ratnagiri rejected the bail application of Mohasin Dastagir Nadaf, accused of sexual assault against a minor under POCSO Act and SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. The court found credible allegations of penetrative sexual assault with threats, DNA evidence indicating involvement, and risk of witness intimidation, outweighing the accused's 5.5 months custody and completed investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL DENIED The Special Court, Ratnagiri rejected the bail application of Mohasin Dastagir Nadaf, accused of sexual assault against a minor under POCSO Act and SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. The court found credible allegations of penetrative sexual assault with threats, DNA evidence indicating involvement, and risk of witness intimidation, outweighing the accused's 5.5 months custody and completed investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts