Krishna Parshuram Bhide etc. 2(Legal Heir) Represented by Power of Attorney - Anand Krishna Bhide vs Radhakrishna Mandir Vaishya Sansta Ratnagiri Through President etc. 12 Advocate - Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad — 58/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRT010007882017
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
566/2017
Filing Date
31-10-2017
Registration No
58/2017
Registration Date
02-11-2017
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishna Parshuram Bhide etc. 2(Legal Heir) Represented by Power of Attorney - Anand Krishna Bhide
Adv. Sukhatankar Sandhya Kishor1.
Anand Krishna Bhide
Adv. Sukhatankar Sandhya Kishor1.
Shrikant Krishna Bhide
Adv. Sukhatankar Sandhya Kishor1.
Kishor Krishna Bhide
Adv. Sukhatankar Sandhya Kishor1.
Sanjivani Devendra Joshi
Adv. Sukhatankar Sandhya Kishor
Vasudha Krishna BhideRepresented by Power of Attorney -Anand Krishna Bhide
Adv. Sukhatankar Sandhya Kishor,Exparte Exparte
Respondent(s)
Radhakrishna Mandir Vaishya Sansta Ratnagiri Through President etc. 12 Advocate - Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad
Prabhakar Pandurang Bhingarde
Adv. Exparte
Mangesh Chandrakant Sansare
Adv. Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad
Vilas Vasant Malushte
Adv. Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad
Shashank Shrikrishna Gandhi
Adv. Exparte
Tushar Purushottam Devalekar
Adv. Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad
Ajay Ganpat Gandhi
Adv. Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad
Yogesh Bhaskar Malushte
Adv. Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad
Nilesh Chandrakant Malushte
Adv. Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad
Milind Manohar Dali
Adv. Mahajni Ruchi Shivprasad
Satish M. Dali
Adv. Exparte
Vinayak B. Pathare
Adv. Exparte
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 31-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition is allowed and the appeal is remanded. The court permitted the legal heir of Respondent No. 1 (who died on 16/05/2020) to be substituted as a party in the case and to be impleaded as a defendant. The court further directed that the heir shall be included in the suit records with proper corrections and amendments made accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition is allowed and the appeal is remanded. The court permitted the legal heir of Respondent No. 1 (who died on 16/05/2020) to be substituted as a party in the case and to be impleaded as a defendant. The court further directed that the heir shall be included in the suit records with proper corrections and amendments made accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts