State of Maharashtra vs Ajay Rajendra Kanekar etc. 4 Advocate - Tharwal Sachin Sudhir — 55/2023

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),21(c),22(c),29,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHRT010007412023

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

20th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

302/2023

Filing Date

08-12-2023

Registration No

55/2023

Registration Date

11-12-2023

Court

District and session court , Ratnagiri

Judge

3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

Sangameshwar Police Station Sangameshwar.

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT Section 8(c),21(c),22(c),29,

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Nalawde Meghana Suhas

Respondent(s)

Ajay Rajendra Kanekar etc. 4 Advocate - Tharwal Sachin Sudhir

Akshara Ajay Kanekar

Adv. Bapat Sanket Vinayak

Mushtaq Ibrahim Mullaji

Adv. Ghag Sanket Ketan

Kamil Hasan Mulla

Adv. Tharwal Sachin Sudhir

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri

08-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

28-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

28-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

09-10-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary Bail Granted. Accused No. 3 Mustak Ibrahim Mullaji's bail application in NDPS Special Case No. 55/2023 was allowed. The court found that the Bombay High Court had already granted bail to co-accused No. 1 on grounds of non-compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act (improper waiver procedures), constituting a substantial change in circumstances applicable to this applicant as well. He was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety in the like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Bail Granted. Accused No. 3 Mustak Ibrahim Mullaji's bail application in NDPS Special Case No. 55/2023 was allowed. The court found that the Bombay High Court had already granted bail to co-accused No. 1 on grounds of non-compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act (improper waiver procedures), constituting a substantial change in circumstances applicable to this applicant as well. He was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety in the like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and session court , Ratnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case