State of Maharashtra vs Sandip Govind Shivgan Etc 4 Advocate - Dingankar Mudassar Liyakat — 20/2023
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(C),22(B),29,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRT010004482023
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
152/2023
Filing Date
12-07-2023
Registration No
20/2023
Registration Date
18-07-2023
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
FIR Details
FIR Number
128
Police Station
Ratnagiri City Police Station Ratnagiri.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Sandip Govind Shivgan Etc 4 Advocate - Dingankar Mudassar Liyakat
Akib Khalid Kazi
Adv. Dingankar Mudassar Liyakat
Tausif Asif Mirajkar
Adv. Nene Pradeep Pandharinath
Jahir Mehmood Kazi
Adv. Dingankar Mudassar Liyakat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Sessions Judge Ratnagiri.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 27-10-2025 | Hearing | |
| 25-08-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
OUTCOME SUMMARY: Bail granted to both applicants. Accused No.1 Sandeep Govind Shivgan and Accused No.4 Jahir Mehamood Kazi were released on bail in an NDPS drug case (possession of heroin) on execution of PR bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, regular trial attendance, and restrictions on residence change. The court found the quantity seized (4.7 gm) was intermediate quantity (below 20 gm commercial threshold) and applied parity principle since co-accused Nos. 2 and 3 were already released on bail with similar charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
OUTCOME SUMMARY: Bail granted to both applicants. Accused No.1 Sandeep Govind Shivgan and Accused No.4 Jahir Mehamood Kazi were released on bail in an NDPS drug case (possession of heroin) on execution of PR bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, regular trial attendance, and restrictions on residence change. The court found the quantity seized (4.7 gm) was intermediate quantity (below 20 gm commercial threshold) and applied parity principle since co-accused Nos. 2 and 3 were already released on bail with similar charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts